|
|
 |
|
|
Subscribe
to this podcast with:
| |
|

|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Dateline Washington Podcast Page
Listen to recent podcasts, download episodes, and share with your friends using with the buttons below. New episodes are posted daily. You may also subscribe to the feed using your preferred RSS reader or podcast player.
What Is Podcasting?
If you are new to podcasting and would like to learn how to have all this great, free content automatically delivered to your computer or mp3 player, please click here.
Dateline Washington
 |
|
|
'New and Troubling':
Famed constitutional attorney Floyd Abrams is deeply troubled by the Justice Department's controversial seizure of Associated Press phone records and the targeting of a Fox News reporter as a criminal and he says the White House reaction to the stories is woefully insufficient.
In his lengthy career of trying first amendment cases, Abrams defended the publishers of the Pentagon Papers, Al Franken against the Fox News Channel and tobacco companies against the Food and Drug Administration.
The Justice Department is under heavy scrutiny for seizing phone records for more than 20 phone lines connected to Associated Press reporters without trying to secure cooperation from AP in the first place. Days later it was revealed that James Rosen of Fox News was branded a criminal and a co-conspirator in a State Department leak over a story on North Korea.
Abrams says there is always a tension between the prying role of the press and the protecting role of the government, but he believes the recently revealed actions of the Justice Department go beyond previous federal attempts to limit information seen by the public.
The notion that in the name of finding out who leaked information that more or less anything goes in an effort to find that out. That's something new. That sort of breaches the wall that has historically existed, said Abrams. It's a new and troubling development.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney responded to both the Associated Press and Rosen stories by saying the administration respects the right of an unfettered press to pursue stories but that there needs to be a balance with national security concerns. While optimistic that federal officials will shape up as a result of these controversies, Abrams says the reaction from the White House is less than reassuring.
Yeah, I mean that's true that you need a balance and it's true, of course national security matters a lot, a lot, a lot. The fact is it's just not an answer to what they've done. They can protect national security by giving AP notice in advance and letting them go to court and fight it out. They can protect national security without defaming and branding journalists as criminals, said Abrams. I think they've got to lighten up a little bit and be a little more realistic about the proposition that leak investigations are not the single greatest priority of any administration, or they shouldn't be.
According to Abrams, leak investigations are often justified but the Justice Department made a big mistake is never trying to solicit cooperation from the AP.
As a general proposition, you've got to tell the press organization. You've got to talk to them. You have to try to come to some sort of agreement, said Abrams. If you can't, and I don't think they could have here, that gives the press organization a chance to go to court and have a judge decide how to weight this factor and that factor, you know how much does the government need it as against what is the intrusion into the freedom of the press.
I do fault the Justice Department for not giving them notice, for not giving them a chance to go to court. The only possible justification that I can think of, certainly on the record here, is that the department said they were doing it because it would interfere with the investigation. I don't know how. I'm not persuaded of that at all, he said.
His skepticism was bolstered by subsequent reporting that the Associated Press honored CIA requests to hold the story on a terrorist plot to bomb an airliner out of Yemen near the one-year anniversary of the mission that killed Osama Bin Laden. The AP honored that request and held the story until the CIA confirmed the security threat had passed. The Obama administration then requested a delay of another day so it could break the news. The organization rejected that request and ran the story ahead of the White House announcement.
The AP really played by the rules and by the rules I mean the responsible rule of journalists behaving the way we would like them to, said Abrams, who says the AP was fully justified in rejecting the White House request and publishing the story whenever it wanted once the CIA gave clearance.
Whether any of this after that was in retribution is hard to tell but it just makes the whole thing even more suspicious in terms of whether there was that sort of national security need to behave as the department did. It's not a little thing for them to go to the telephone company and gather records of a news organization without permission, said Abrams.
As alarmed as Abrams is by the Justice Department's treatment of the Associated Press, he's even more uneasy about the department declaring Rosen a criminal and getting a warrant for his phone and email records and those of Fox News executives and even Rosen's parents.
I think this one's even worse than the AP story. I've read the redacted version that is available of the application that the Department of Justice made in court. They basically accused the journalist of being a criminal, literally a criminal, for doing the interviewing that they did and trying to persuade someone to give them a story, said Abrams. Journalists at their best are prying, are asking questions, are trying to get information. Treating them like criminals, branding them as criminals is absolutely unacceptable.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
IRS Trampled Over Rights:
Washington Rep. Dave Reichert says outgoing IRS Commissioner Steven Miller failed to honor his oath before the House Ways & Means Committee last week and that the congressional investigation into the government targeting and harassing conservative organizations is just getting started.
Reichert was one of several committee members who grilled Miller on Friday and came away frustrated by Miller 19s chronic memory lapses. In one exchange, Miller could remember who he spoke with about where responsibility lies for this scandal but couldn 19t remember who that person believed was ultimately responsible for the policy.
1cI think that Mr. Miller was not abiding by the oath that he took right before his testimony began. He was asked to stand and hold his right hand in the air and testify to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Mr. Miller, I believe, was not true to that oath, 1d said Reichert. 1dI don 19t know if his attorneys were advising him to be vague in his answers and answer 18I don 19t know 19 because of some concern there may be some future implications legally for Mr. Miller, but that 19s my guess. 1d
1cIt was really a disservice to the American people and shows an arrogance. In fact, when I asked Mr. Miller if he felt any duty on his part to share the information he knew with Congress, he said that he saw absolutely none. He also mentioned that he really didn 19t feel any compulsion or any responsibility in going to his boss, 1d said Reichert, who says that same attitude seems to be rampant in the White House as well.
1cI think that the unfolding events of the White House timeline shows, if not deception, at least a great amount of confusion that leads one to suspect that there may be some lack of memory purposefully from some of the persons representing what the White House knew when, 1d he said.
Reichert says we are just seeing the early stages of this investigation since one hasn 19t been done yet - even by the IRS. He says it 19s important to note that the IRS inspector general 19s report was not at all exhaustive.
1cThe IG has only done an audit and that audit is still in the process. The actual investigation of who knew what and when is really just beginning, 1d said Reichert. 1dThere are a number of avenues that this investigation will follow and then determining the outcome of who will lose their jobs, who may be charged with a crime, if anyone. That 19ll all come at the conclusion of these investigations. 1d
In addition to getting to the bottom of the scandal, many members of Congress are urging policy changes such as stripping the IRS of Obamacare enforcement powers or reforming the tax code to minimize the role of the agency. For Reichert, the most important thing is reining in the imperial attitude of the IRS and others in government.
1cThe biggest issue for me is the arrogance of our IRS leadership, that they can do anything they want to do. The issue really boils down to our civil rights as Americans guaranteed by the Constitution. The IRS in my opinion has trampled all over those rights, 1d said Reichert.
|
|
|
|